To begin with the most obvious of them all, he appeals to the curiosity of the reader. His first-hand encounters with the evils of imperialism during his time as a police officer in Burma make him a reputable source of knowledge about the conditions and Shooting and elephant george orwell rhetorical analysis of the British oppression of Burma.
Orwell realizes that throughout his entire rule in Burma he is actually the victim of the Burmese, and it is their expectations of what he should do with his power that force him to do what they want. By limiting the freedom of others, the British have actually forced themselves to adopt a limited, exaggerated role in order to maintain their grip on authority—and thus limited their own freedoms far more sharply.
These bullets do nothing; the elephant continues to breathe torturously. As Blair continues to expand on the actual story being told he appeals to pity on more than one occasion. The appeal to pity here is the struggle that Blair is fighting in his mind and he makes it absolutely clear that it is indeed a strugglewhich makes the audience sympathetic towards him and in turn be more liable to accept his argument as truth.
They are now controlled by the British. The audience sees what is happening to him: This conflicted mindset is typical of officers in the British Raj, he explains. For example, much like the Burmese who have been colonized and who abuse Orwell, the elephant has been provoked to destructive behavior by being oppressed.
In order to accomplish his task of clarifying the true nature of imperialism for his audience, Blair appeals to many emotions along the way. A third shot downs the elephant. Those harmed by the violence are either silenced—like the elephant—or lack recourse—like its owner.
He writes as though he is seeing himself in the third person. Orwell also uses some connotations and denotations in the essay.
Just as he empathizes with the oppressed Burmese, Orwell recognizes that the elephant is a peaceful creature that has been driven to rebellion by its mistreatment. Orwell purposefully recounts his negative experiences in Burma to reinforce his view that imperialism is harmful on both ends.
Shortly thereafter, the Burmese stripped the meat off its bones. He claims that it is evil and he is fully against the oppressors, the British. Burmese trip Orwell during soccer games and hurl insults at him as he walks down the street.
As the reader reads the first two pages, many questions are subconsciously being asked in their mind.
It is clear that the conventions of imperialism make Orwell feel compelled to perform a particular inhumane and irrational role. Blair found himself in Moulmein, Burma, as a police officer of the town.
After a bit of time, the elephant sinks to its knees and begins to drool. This paragraph reveals to the audience the mental suffering that Blair had undergone throughout this experience. Evidently, colonialism and the power dynamics it entails are too convoluted to be contained within a single straightforward point of view.
Because it is both a harmless animal and a valuable piece of property, it is clear that there is no ethical or practical reason to hurt the elephant. Orwell feels uncomfortable—he had not planned to shoot the elephant, and requested the rifle only for self-defense.
In the same way, the British empire is inhumane not out of necessity, but rather out of reactionary ignorance regarding both the land it has colonized and the pernicious way that colonization acts on both the colonized and the colonizer.
At the start of the paragraph, he states that he knew exactly what to do in order to handle the situation with the elephant. Orwell waits for it to die, but it continues to breathe.
The locals tell Orwell that the elephant has kept to itself, but may charge if provoked. The build-up of finding the elephant is a metaphor itself showing the destructive power of imperialism: Imperialism is an institution that destroys both the oppressor and the oppressed.
Orwell reneges on his ethical and practical conclusions almost as quickly as he makes them. He realizes he can not avoid shooting the elephant. While he holds symbolic authority and military supremacy, Orwell is still powerless to stop the jibes and abuse he receives from oppressed Burmese.
From the outset, Orwell establishes that the power dynamics in colonial Burma are far from black-and-white. The realization dawned upon him that the Burmese who are being oppressed by his people are actually the ones who are in complete control. And that is exactly what Blair is trying to do; his goal is to unveil the vainness of imperialism.
While persuasion is most commonly associated with in-your-face advertisements and political speeches, more subtle rhetorical artifacts, such as novels and essays, can contain equally persuasive elements.
Orwell heads toward the affected area. The young Buddhist priests torment him the most. One of the two levels utilized by the curiosity appeal keeps the attention of the reader and carries them on to the meat of the essay, while the other plants a few rhetorical devices such as the appeal of spite in paragraphs one and two and gets the reader in a certain state of mind for what Blair has in store for them.Analysis of Shooting an Elephant Introduction Shooting an Elephant is a short story written by George Orwell.
The story depicts a young man who has to decide whether to bend to the rules of his superiors or to the majority, or to follow his own path.
Rhetorical Analysis of Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Essay Sample. While reading the essay Shooting an Elephant, first published in by Eric Blair under the pen name of George Orwell, one gets captivated by the intricate web of rhetoric that Blair weaves throughout the piece.
Sep 24, · For WTA Tour Tennis on the GameCube, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "George Orwell "Shooting An Elephant" rhetorical analysis essay".Operating System: GC, GBA, PS2, XBOX. "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell is an essay first published in in a literary magazine called New Writing.
Orwell, an English author, had been employed in Indian Imperial Police, part.
Need help with “Shooting an Elephant” in George Orwell's Shooting an Elephant? Check out our revolutionary side-by-side summary and analysis. “Shooting an Elephant” Summary & Analysis from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes.
George Orwell’s Shooting An Elephant is a great essay combining personal experience and political opinion. The transitions he makes between narration and the actual story is so subtle the flow of the essay is easy to read.Download