At the same time, the NCAA National Collegiate Athletic Association prohibits college athletes to be monetarily compensated for their efforts, which is definitely unfair.
Paying athletes would make them less dependent on their parents and take them out of the dept from their student loans. Those who use this argument believe that if a student-athlete is good enough to get paid then they will be compensated when the time is right.
It is hard for college athletes to find extra money to get a pizza or go see a movie. Universities need the best athletes. For example, a typical first division college football player trains approximately As ofevery division one c Paying college athletes would greatly benefit both the athlete and the school.
There are many other cases happening across the country that no one knows about. Because athletes Argument essay paying college athletes not remunerated for their dedication to their sports colleges may feel pressure to bribe or compensate players for a job well done, or a commitment or contract with the school.
In conclusion, college athletes should get paid for the time that they put into there respective sports. For example, many division I football teams practice twice a day. This can lead to an increasing amount of debt because no income is gained to pay for college.
The large debt would accumulate from every day to day expenses over the athletes four years of college. Opposing views of paying college athletes believe that the athletes are getting enough money from the scholarships.
If the athletes were to stay in school they would complete their degree and have a better outlook on life. Colleges, especially big Division 1 universities, bring in millions during football season.
Paying college athletes could also solve a significant problem of athletes quitting schools and colleges. Two out of every five Division athletes mom from single parent homes and athletics are their only opportunity to provide a future for themselves and their families.
Only one third of college athletes receive a scholarship, the majority of those are partial, and only one percent of all college athletes make it to the pros.
Then, since you are failing a few of classes, you have a tutoring session. Many people believe athletes should get paid for their hard work, while others believe that it would ruin the integrity of the sport if the athletes were to get paid. Many will argue that college athletes do not need to be compensated because they are student-athletes; and the key word for them is student.
My name is Brandon Teribery and I believe that colleges should, in some way, pay athletes that represent their school. Michigan became the first school to ever Start five freshman in a college basketball name.Paying college athletes argumentative essay (nyu creative writing admissions) By On شهر ۲۰, ۱۳۹۷ ۱ 0 When your friend asked you a simple question and you write her an essay in response.
@lovelexxi__. Additionally, the people that oppose this argument believe that colleges should not pay college athletes because they have the opportunity to go professional and get paid hundreds of thousand dollars and sometimes over a million. Another argument that supports paying college athletes is that these “full-ride” scholarships given to the best athletes do not actually cover all their expenses.
Many athletes still can’t afford to have their parents come to the stadium and watch the games. Free College Essay Persuasive Essay- Paying College Athletes.
Salaries in College College athletes juggle busy academic schedules and practice schedules all throughout their 3/5(2). An Argument for Paying College Athletes By: Keith Riffle For quite some time now, there has been a big debate about whether or not college athletes should be paid.
College athletes should be paid their due for a number of reasons. The NCAA should pay student athletes because it can do it.
According to polls among economists, there are no financial factors that prevent the NCAA from paying their athletes.Download